Sunday, October 30, 2011

A fallacy

Once again, posting on Sunday; I was so preoccupied with the essay that I didn't have a chance to blog before now.


Inspired by Trevor's post:

If all dinosaurs are now dead, then they are mortal beings
All dinosaurs are now dead
All dinosaurs are mortal beings
All humans are mortal beings
---------------------------------
All humans are now dead

Friday, October 21, 2011

A useful trick

Interpret the words formal and informal literally - as 'related to form' and 'not related to form,' respectively. This makes it easier to remember the difference between formal and informal fallacies - formal fallacies have to do with the form of the argument and informal fallacies have nothing to do with the form.

Sunday, October 16, 2011

Casual (mis)use of technical terms, and thoughts on time

I used to use the retort "your argument is invalid" frequently in casual conversation, but I recently realized that continuing to use it would require far too much work: analyzing the other person's statement to determine whether it is an argument at all, then if it is deductive, then testing for validity... And in any case, that would take up enough time that the conversation would have moved on by the time I got through that process.

Boarding an entirely different train of thought, Ryan Walters raised some interesting questions about time in his post from last week. It made me wonder how people began measuring time. What sort of logical process led humans to break down the natural rhythm of sunrises and sunsets into 24 equal parts, and each of those parts into 60 (almost more arbitrary than 24) smaller sections? Or did they go the other way, somehow deciding how long a second was, and working their way up? For that matter, was logic even involved at all?